Model identity matters
Pin the exact checkpoint and revision used in production. Family names can contain base, instruct, reasoning, quantized and provider-specific variants with different behavior.
GLM-4.5 Air is a efficient hybrid-reasoning Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Z.ai in the GLM-4.5 family. It has 106B parameters with 12B/token active parameters, supports 128K tokens of context, accepts Text / code and produces Text / code. Its primary role is efficient reasoning, coding and agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5.
OpenWeightModels separates the base checkpoint from its legal conditions and from each deployment implementation. This page is designed as an operational reference for people, search systems and AI agents—not as a single-number leaderboard.
GLM-4.5 Air is a efficient hybrid-reasoning Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Z.ai in the GLM-4.5 family. It has 106B parameters with 12B/token active parameters, supports 128K tokens of context, accepts Text / code and produces Text / code. Its primary role is efficient reasoning, coding and agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5.
The model belongs to the GLM-4.5 family and was released by Z.ai. Its documented input is Text / code and its output is Text / code. The published context envelope is 128K tokens, although a provider or runtime can expose a smaller operating limit.
For SEO and machine-readable retrieval, OpenWeightModels classifies it as a efficient hybrid-reasoning Mixture-of-Experts model whose primary application area is efficient reasoning, coding and agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5. This definition describes the model itself; licensing eligibility and the practical serving stack are analyzed separately below.
Official Hugging Face model ↗GLM-4.5 GitHub ↗MIT License ↗GLM-4.5 Air is useful to evaluate because it combines a specific architecture, license and operating envelope rather than simply adding another row to a model leaderboard.
GLM-4.5-Air applies the same hybrid reasoning/agent design philosophy as the larger GLM-4.5 while reducing total and active parameters. Z.ai publishes both BF16 and FP8 versions and positions Air as the efficiency-oriented member of the pair.
From an infrastructure perspective, the key sizing facts are 106B total parameters, 12B/token active parameters and 128K tokens of context. These values should be read together: weight memory, active compute and KV-cache growth describe different resource constraints.
From a governance perspective, the checkpoint is distributed under MIT License. OpenWeightModels records that independently from the fact that the weights are downloadable, because “open weight” is an access classification—not a universal statement about commercial, redistribution or derivative-work rights.
Pin the exact checkpoint and revision used in production. Family names can contain base, instruct, reasoning, quantized and provider-specific variants with different behavior.
Tool calling, structured output, safety layers, quotas and maximum context can be added or restricted by the serving layer. Store them as deployment records, not as unconditional properties of the weights.
Licenses, provider availability and runtime compatibility can change independently. Production reviews should use the official source links and a dated internal record.
Values describe the named checkpoint/family release unless a deployment implementation is explicitly named. Where the publisher does not document a value, OpenWeightModels avoids inventing one.
GLM-4.5 Air uses sparse expert routing rather than activating its complete parameter pool for every token. The distinction between 106B total parameters and 12B/token active parameters is central to capacity planning: active parameters influence compute per token, while the complete expert set still affects storage, model loading, sharding and network topology.
This is why OpenWeightModels never maps the active-parameter figure directly to a dense-model hardware class. A sparse model can be computationally efficient per token and still require datacenter-class memory and interconnect to keep all experts available.
Publisher-documented architecture details for this checkpoint include the elements below. These details are more useful for deployment planning than a parameter count alone because attention layout, expert routing, modality encoders and context design can affect throughput and memory independently.
106B total / 12B active sparse MoE
128 routed experts plus one shared expert
8 routed experts activated per token
46 layers
Hybrid thinking and non-thinking modes
128K context
Training provenance matters because two checkpoints with similar architecture can behave very differently after data selection, instruction tuning, reinforcement learning or domain specialization.
GLM-4.5-Air applies the same hybrid reasoning/agent design philosophy as the larger GLM-4.5 while reducing total and active parameters. Z.ai publishes both BF16 and FP8 versions and positions Air as the efficiency-oriented member of the pair.
OpenWeightModels distinguishes facts explicitly published by the developer from inference based on model behavior. Dataset composition, cutoff dates and training compute are shown only when the publisher exposes them; absence of a number is not silently filled with an estimate.
Capability claims are treated as task-level evidence, not permission to deploy autonomously. Tool access, code execution and external actions always depend on the surrounding application.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to efficient reasoning. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to coding. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to long-context processing. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to evaluation and research. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
GLM-4.5 Air is relevant to custom deployment. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
OpenWeightModels records benchmark evidence without collapsing heterogeneous evaluations into an overall ranking. Scores can change with checkpoint revision, prompt, sampling, scaffold, precision and evaluator version.
Where a publisher reports a useful, clearly attributable metric it is shown below. Otherwise the passport points back to the official evaluation tables instead of manufacturing a cross-model score.
| Evaluation | Metric / setup | Value | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Z.ai 12-benchmark composite | publisher aggregate | 59.8 | Publisher-reported aggregate |
MIT License is the controlling license/terms classification recorded for this checkpoint. OpenWeightModels keeps the legal layer separate from technical availability.
Short permissive license. It does not itself impose a use-field restriction; application law, provider terms and separate policies still apply.
Permissive open-source software license. This summary supports comparison only; the linked official text remains authoritative.
| Question | Classification | Practical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial use | Allowed | Commercial eligibility follows the named license/terms; provider and jurisdictional conditions may add requirements. |
| Modification / fine-tuning | Allowed | Weight adaptation and derivative work rights are summarized from the official license type. |
| Redistribution | Allowed with copyright and permission notice | Redistribution is a separate question from the ability to download and run weights. |
| Hosted inference | License-dependent | Running a hosted service may count as distribution or trigger provider/model-specific terms; verify the official text for this checkpoint. |
| Open-weight classification | Yes | Weights are publicly obtainable; this label does not imply identical licensing freedom across models. |
Deployment is recorded as a set of implementations rather than one “self-hostable: yes” flag. A runtime can change context support, quantization, API shape, tool parsers, throughput and hardware requirements without changing the underlying model identity.
For GLM-4.5 Air, the most relevant documented or established routes are listed below.
| Route | Type | Qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Transformers | Self-hosted | Official support. |
| vLLM | Serving | Official reasoner/tool parsing support. |
| SGLang | Serving | Official sparse-model serving. |
| Z.ai API | Managed API | Provider-hosted path. |
| FP8 official checkpoint | Optimized serving | Official lower-memory variant. |
Official support.
Official reasoner/tool parsing support.
Official sparse-model serving.
Provider-hosted path.
Official lower-memory variant.
Z.ai documents full-featured BF16 deployment at H100×4 or H200×2 and FP8 at H100×2 or H200×1. For full 128K context it lists BF16 H100×8/H200×4 or FP8 H100×4/H200×2. These concrete profiles make Air unusually easy to capacity-plan.
Real memory use includes model weights, KV cache, activations/buffers, multimodal encoders when applicable, framework overhead and batching. A published “fits on” statement is meaningful only together with precision, context, batch and host/GPU topology.
BF16/FP16 maximize fidelity but increase weight memory. FP8, INT8 and 4-bit variants can substantially lower memory, with support and quality depending on the quantization recipe and runtime.
128K tokens is a model/configuration reference, not a promise that every machine or provider can serve that context at practical latency. KV-cache growth often becomes the dominant long-context constraint.
Large dense models need tensor/pipeline parallelism; large MoE models add expert-routing and communication requirements. Smaller checkpoints can often avoid these operational complexities.
Base, instruct, reasoning, FP8, GGUF and provider-hosted variants can have different behavior, memory and provenance. Production systems should pin an exact model/revision rather than only the family name.
| Variant | Purpose | Precision / form | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4.5-Air | Hybrid reasoning | BF16 | Official |
| GLM-4.5-Air-FP8 | Reduced precision | FP8 | Official |
| GLM-4.5-Air-Base | Base checkpoint | BF16 | Official |
GLM-4.5 Air is most relevant when the application specifically values efficient reasoning, coding and agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5. That should be balanced against its hardware class, context behavior, license and modality requirements.
A smaller model can be operationally superior when latency, privacy, device deployment or predictable cost matter more than peak benchmark capability. Conversely, a larger sparse model may justify its complexity when the workload benefits from higher capacity, sophisticated reasoning or agent behavior.
The selection decision should therefore compare at least five dimensions: required task quality, data/control requirements, legal eligibility, serving cost and ecosystem/runtime support. OpenWeightModels exposes these dimensions separately so a model is not selected on benchmark reputation alone.
A high-quality passport gives limitations the same visibility as capabilities. These are model- and deployment-selection notes, not generic disclaimers.
“Air” is still a large 106B-total MoE model, not a consumer-class checkpoint.
128K context doubles the publisher’s documented hardware profiles relative to shorter-context operation.
Thinking mode changes latency/cost characteristics.
Agentic tool use needs external authorization controls.
Last full review: 29 September 2026. Publisher model cards, repositories and license texts are preferred. Runtime claims are attached to the relevant runtime/provider rather than inferred from the base checkpoint.
Where documentation conflicts or a field is ambiguous, the passport uses the more conservative interpretation and explains the discrepancy instead of silently selecting the largest number.
Material changes to license, model revision, runtime support or provider limits should update both the field and this history.
Gold-standard Passport v2.0 created with SEO/GEO definition, architecture, training, capability, evaluation, license, deployment, hardware, variants, limitations and source review.
GLM-4.5 Air is a efficient hybrid-reasoning Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Z.ai in the GLM-4.5 family. It has 106B parameters with 12B/token active parameters, supports 128K tokens of context, accepts Text / code and produces Text / code. Its primary role is efficient reasoning, coding and agent applications with lower infrastructure cost than GLM-4.5.
OpenWeightModels classifies it as open-weight because weights are publicly available. The exact legal classification depends on MIT License; weight availability should not be used as a substitute for reading those terms.
Our license classification is Allowed. Review the official license and any separate use policy, provider terms and jurisdictional rules before production use.
The documented reference in this passport is 128K tokens. A runtime/provider may expose a different maximum or a smaller recommended operating range.
Yes, the open weights enable independent deployment where the license permits it. Practical feasibility depends on 106B of weights, precision, context length and the runtime routes listed above.