Model identity matters
Pin the exact checkpoint and revision used in production. Family names can contain base, instruct, reasoning, quantized and provider-specific variants with different behavior.
Llama 4 Scout is a natively multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Meta in the Llama 4 family. It has ~109B parameters with 17B/token active parameters, supports 10,000,000 tokens of context, accepts Text + images and produces Text + code. Its primary role is very-long-context multimodal understanding, assistants, documents and code.
OpenWeightModels separates the base checkpoint from its legal conditions and from each deployment implementation. This page is designed as an operational reference for people, search systems and AI agents—not as a single-number leaderboard.
Llama 4 Scout is a natively multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Meta in the Llama 4 family. It has ~109B parameters with 17B/token active parameters, supports 10,000,000 tokens of context, accepts Text + images and produces Text + code. Its primary role is very-long-context multimodal understanding, assistants, documents and code.
The model belongs to the Llama 4 family and was released by Meta. Its documented input is Text + images and its output is Text + code. The published context envelope is 10,000,000 tokens, although a provider or runtime can expose a smaller operating limit.
For SEO and machine-readable retrieval, OpenWeightModels classifies it as a natively multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model whose primary application area is very-long-context multimodal understanding, assistants, documents and code. This definition describes the model itself; licensing eligibility and the practical serving stack are analyzed separately below.
Official Meta model card ↗Meta Llama 4 release ↗Llama 4 license ↗Llama 4 Scout is useful to evaluate because it combines a specific architecture, license and operating envelope rather than simply adding another row to a model leaderboard.
Meta reports roughly 40T pretraining tokens for Scout, an August 2024 knowledge cutoff, broad multilingual pretraining and a multimodal training pipeline. Post-training follows the Llama 4 family approach combining supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning and preference optimization.
From an infrastructure perspective, the key sizing facts are ~109B total parameters, 17B/token active parameters and 10,000,000 tokens of context. These values should be read together: weight memory, active compute and KV-cache growth describe different resource constraints.
From a governance perspective, the checkpoint is distributed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement. OpenWeightModels records that independently from the fact that the weights are downloadable, because “open weight” is an access classification—not a universal statement about commercial, redistribution or derivative-work rights.
Pin the exact checkpoint and revision used in production. Family names can contain base, instruct, reasoning, quantized and provider-specific variants with different behavior.
Tool calling, structured output, safety layers, quotas and maximum context can be added or restricted by the serving layer. Store them as deployment records, not as unconditional properties of the weights.
Licenses, provider availability and runtime compatibility can change independently. Production reviews should use the official source links and a dated internal record.
Values describe the named checkpoint/family release unless a deployment implementation is explicitly named. Where the publisher does not document a value, OpenWeightModels avoids inventing one.
Llama 4 Scout uses sparse expert routing rather than activating its complete parameter pool for every token. The distinction between ~109B total parameters and 17B/token active parameters is central to capacity planning: active parameters influence compute per token, while the complete expert set still affects storage, model loading, sharding and network topology.
This is why OpenWeightModels never maps the active-parameter figure directly to a dense-model hardware class. A sparse model can be computationally efficient per token and still require datacenter-class memory and interconnect to keep all experts available.
Publisher-documented architecture details for this checkpoint include the elements below. These details are more useful for deployment planning than a parameter count alone because attention layout, expert routing, modality encoders and context design can affect throughput and memory independently.
Autoregressive sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture
16 routed experts with sparse activation
Native early-fusion multimodality
Vision encoder based on MetaCLIP adaptations
Very-long-context design up to 10M tokens in the model card
Training provenance matters because two checkpoints with similar architecture can behave very differently after data selection, instruction tuning, reinforcement learning or domain specialization.
Meta reports roughly 40T pretraining tokens for Scout, an August 2024 knowledge cutoff, broad multilingual pretraining and a multimodal training pipeline. Post-training follows the Llama 4 family approach combining supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning and preference optimization.
OpenWeightModels distinguishes facts explicitly published by the developer from inference based on model behavior. Dataset composition, cutoff dates and training compute are shown only when the publisher exposes them; absence of a number is not silently filled with an estimate.
Capability claims are treated as task-level evidence, not permission to deploy autonomously. Tool access, code execution and external actions always depend on the surrounding application.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to very-long-context multimodal understanding. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to assistants. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to documents. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to code. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to evaluation and research. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
Llama 4 Scout is relevant to custom deployment. Capability should be validated against the exact checkpoint, prompt format and runtime rather than inferred only from family branding or a benchmark headline.
OpenWeightModels records benchmark evidence without collapsing heterogeneous evaluations into an overall ranking. Scores can change with checkpoint revision, prompt, sampling, scaffold, precision and evaluator version.
Where a publisher reports a useful, clearly attributable metric it is shown below. Otherwise the passport points back to the official evaluation tables instead of manufacturing a cross-model score.
| Evaluation | Metric / setup | Value | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publisher evaluation | Model-card evidence | Not normalized | OpenWeightModels does not invent a single composite score for Llama 4 Scout. Use the official model card for checkpoint-specific benchmarks and conditions. |
Llama 4 Community License Agreement is the controlling license/terms classification recorded for this checkpoint. OpenWeightModels keeps the legal layer separate from technical availability.
Includes the 700M-MAU special licensing condition; the incorporated Llama 4 AUP contains a specific EU developer restriction for multimodal Llama 4 models while excluding end users of products/services from that particular restriction.
Custom model license + incorporated Acceptable Use Policy. This summary supports comparison only; the linked official text remains authoritative.
| Question | Classification | Practical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial use | Conditional | Commercial eligibility follows the named license/terms; provider and jurisdictional conditions may add requirements. |
| Modification / fine-tuning | Allowed subject to terms | Weight adaptation and derivative work rights are summarized from the official license type. |
| Redistribution | Conditional with attribution/notice requirements | Redistribution is a separate question from the ability to download and run weights. |
| Hosted inference | License-dependent | Running a hosted service may count as distribution or trigger provider/model-specific terms; verify the official text for this checkpoint. |
| Open-weight classification | Yes | Weights are publicly obtainable; this label does not imply identical licensing freedom across models. |
Deployment is recorded as a set of implementations rather than one “self-hostable: yes” flag. A runtime can change context support, quantization, API shape, tool parsers, throughput and hardware requirements without changing the underlying model identity.
For Llama 4 Scout, the most relevant documented or established routes are listed below.
| Route | Type | Qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Transformers | Self-hosted | Official checkpoint and processor support. |
| vLLM | Serving | Documented serving path. |
| SGLang | Serving | Documented multimodal serving path. |
| NVIDIA FP8 ecosystem checkpoint | Optimized serving | NVIDIA publishes a separately quantized FP8 Scout checkpoint; this is not the same as a Meta-official FP8 release. |
Official checkpoint and processor support.
Documented serving path.
Documented multimodal serving path.
NVIDIA publishes a separately quantized FP8 Scout checkpoint; this is not the same as a Meta-official FP8 release.
Scout is substantially smaller than Maverick in total parameter count but still stores roughly 109B parameters. The 10M-token context can dominate memory through KV cache; very-long-context deployment should be planned as a specialized workload rather than a default setting.
Real memory use includes model weights, KV cache, activations/buffers, multimodal encoders when applicable, framework overhead and batching. A published “fits on” statement is meaningful only together with precision, context, batch and host/GPU topology.
BF16/FP16 maximize fidelity but increase weight memory. FP8, INT8 and 4-bit variants can substantially lower memory, with support and quality depending on the quantization recipe and runtime.
10,000,000 tokens is a model/configuration reference, not a promise that every machine or provider can serve that context at practical latency. KV-cache growth often becomes the dominant long-context constraint.
Large dense models need tensor/pipeline parallelism; large MoE models add expert-routing and communication requirements. Smaller checkpoints can often avoid these operational complexities.
Base, instruct, reasoning, FP8, GGUF and provider-hosted variants can have different behavior, memory and provenance. Production systems should pin an exact model/revision rather than only the family name.
| Variant | Purpose | Precision / form | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Instruction / multimodal | BF16 | Official Meta |
| NVIDIA Scout FP8 | Optimized serving | FP8 | Third-party NVIDIA |
Llama 4 Scout is most relevant when the application specifically values very-long-context multimodal understanding, assistants, documents and code. That should be balanced against its hardware class, context behavior, license and modality requirements.
A smaller model can be operationally superior when latency, privacy, device deployment or predictable cost matter more than peak benchmark capability. Conversely, a larger sparse model may justify its complexity when the workload benefits from higher capacity, sophisticated reasoning or agent behavior.
The selection decision should therefore compare at least five dimensions: required task quality, data/control requirements, legal eligibility, serving cost and ecosystem/runtime support. OpenWeightModels exposes these dimensions separately so a model is not selected on benchmark reputation alone.
A high-quality passport gives limitations the same visibility as capabilities. These are model- and deployment-selection notes, not generic disclaimers.
A 10M model maximum does not imply every runtime or provider exposes 10M.
Image understanding was tested under documented conditions; application-specific multi-image workloads still need validation.
The Llama 4 custom license and incorporated AUP contain material regional and use restrictions.
The active 17B figure should not be confused with the complete model storage footprint.
Last full review: 29 September 2026. Publisher model cards, repositories and license texts are preferred. Runtime claims are attached to the relevant runtime/provider rather than inferred from the base checkpoint.
Where documentation conflicts or a field is ambiguous, the passport uses the more conservative interpretation and explains the discrepancy instead of silently selecting the largest number.
Material changes to license, model revision, runtime support or provider limits should update both the field and this history.
Gold-standard Passport v2.0 created with SEO/GEO definition, architecture, training, capability, evaluation, license, deployment, hardware, variants, limitations and source review.
Llama 4 Scout is a natively multimodal Mixture-of-Experts model developed by Meta in the Llama 4 family. It has ~109B parameters with 17B/token active parameters, supports 10,000,000 tokens of context, accepts Text + images and produces Text + code. Its primary role is very-long-context multimodal understanding, assistants, documents and code.
OpenWeightModels classifies it as open-weight because weights are publicly available. The exact legal classification depends on Llama 4 Community License Agreement; weight availability should not be used as a substitute for reading those terms.
Our license classification is Conditional. Review the official license and any separate use policy, provider terms and jurisdictional rules before production use.
The documented reference in this passport is 10,000,000 tokens. A runtime/provider may expose a different maximum or a smaller recommended operating range.
Yes, the open weights enable independent deployment where the license permits it. Practical feasibility depends on ~109B of weights, precision, context length and the runtime routes listed above.